ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the abnormal dose monitoring result of radiation staff in medical institutions and provide a basis for standardizing the personal dose management of radiation staff in medical institutions.Methods:Through the occupational radiation disease monitoring subsystem of the National Radiation Health Information Platform, 516 individual dose monitoring abnormal result of 410 radiation workers in a single monitoring period, which in 168 medical institutions under the 18 cities in Henan province were collected from 2020 to 2022 as research objects. Based on gender, age, length of service, occupational category, medical institution level, whether the dosimeter wearing standard, the abnormal result of radiation workers were grouped to analyze the influencing factors of individual dose monitoring result.Results:The incidence of abnormal individual dose monitoring result in 2020-2022 was 6.83 × 10 -3, 5.22 × 10 -3 and 6.30 × 10 -3, respectively. Abnormal results were mainly distributed in male radiology workers (66.83%), diagnostic radiology (59.51%) and interventional radiology (34.63%), tertiary (54.39%) and secondary medical institutions (36.34%). In the case of wearing personal dosimeter in a standard or irregular way, there were statistically significant differences in the incidence of abnormal outcomes between different levels of medical institutions and different occupational categories( χ2=14.42, 6.56, 32.96, 177.15, P<0.05). The median annual individual dose of radiology workers with " abnormal exposure dose" due to increased workload was 3.95 mSv, and the annual individual dose of interventional radiology workers was higher than that of radiotherapeutic workers ( Z=5.07, P<0.05). Conclusions:The education and training of radiological protection should be strengthened, and the wearing of individual dosimeters should be standardized; focus on the occupational exposure of interventional radiology staff, and take effective measures to reduce their exposure dose.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the results of national personal dose monitoring intercomparison and assessment of Hubei Provincial Hospital for Occupational Disease in 2016—2021, to investigate the influencing factors for monitoring results, and to improve the ability of personal dose monitoring. Methods The assessment was completed according to the requirements of The National Comparison Scheme for Individual Dose Monitoring Ability and Testing Criteria of Personnel Dosimetry Performance for External Exposure (GBZ 207—2016). Results The assessment results were qualified in 2016—2017 and 2020 and excellent in 2018—2019 and 2021. Conclusion The ability of personal dose monitoring in our laboratory has been continuously improved. The monitoring results are accurate and the data processing is standardized, which meet the requirements of relevant standards for personal external exposure dose monitoring.
ABSTRACT
@#<b>Objective</b> To analyze the process of intercomparison of national personal dose monitoring, evaluate the ability of personal dose monitoring, and ensure the accuracy and reliability of monitoring results in our laboratory. <b>Methods</b> In accordance with the intercomparison protocol for 2019—2021, an energy-discriminant thermoluminescence dosimeter was used for measurement at different doses. The uncertainty of measurement was evaluated and compared with the reference value. <b>Results</b> <i>H</i><sub>p</sub>(10) was measured for intercomparison in 2019—2021. In 2019, the single group performance difference was −0.02 to 0.02 and the comprehensive performance was 0.02. These values were 0.02-0.10 and 0.05 in 2020, and −0.02 to 0.02 and 0.01 in 2021. The intercomparison results were rated as excellent in the three consecutive years. <b>Conclusion</b> The personal dose monitoring system in our laboratory was in good condition, and the monitoring results were accurate and reliable. Improving the knowledge of personnel and cultivating a serious working attitude are important for intercomparison and personal dose monitoring.
ABSTRACT
@#<b>Objective</b> To study whether the disinfection methods for thermoluminescence dosimeters used by major hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on monitoring personal dose of external irradiation, and to screen for the disinfection procedures suitable for use during the pandemic. <b>Methods</b> Hospitals with fever clinics during the epidemic in Shandong Province were selected from March to October 2020, we investigated the disinfection methods as well as the types and frequency of use of disinfection supplies used for thermoluminescence dosimeters during the pandemic in hospitals. Simulations were performed in experimental and control groups. <b>Results</b> The average doses measured by the disc dosimeter with different disinfection methods and the control group were 0.92-0.99 mSv and 0.98 mSv, respectively, and the deviation was ≤ 6%. The average doses measured by the glass tube dosimeter with different disinfection methods and the control group were 0.20-0.22 and 0.21, respectively, and the deviation was ≤ 5%. <b>Conclusion</b> The results showed that the commonly used disinfection methods had no influence on personal dose monitoring, but some disinfection measures were not suitable for dosimeters.
ABSTRACT
@#<b>Objective</b> To determine the effectiveness of quality control measures in the laboratory by participating in the national personal dose monitoring ability assessment, and to improve personal dose monitoring ability and quality. <b>Methods</b> According to the requirements of the National Personal Dose Monitoring Ability Assessment Program and standards, seven groups of personal dosimeter were prepared and irradiated by accurate radiation source as requested, and the dose was measured by the laboratory participating in the assessment. The data were processed, and the uncertainty of the measurement results was evaluated. <b>Results</b> In 2018, the assessment results <i>H</i><sub>p</sub> (10) dose range was 0.68-4.27 mSv, the single group performance deviation was −0.01 to −0.06, and the comprehensive performance deviation was 0.04, and the result was qualified. In 2019, the assessment results <i>H</i><sub>p</sub> (10) dose range was 0.74-8.06 mSv, the single group performance deviation was 0.00 to −0.08, and the comprehensive performance deviation was 0.04, and the result was qualified. In 2020, the assessment results <i>H</i><sub>p</sub>(10) dose range was 0.83-3.93 mSv, the single group performance deviation was −0.01 to −0.10, and the comprehensive performance deviation was 0.06, and the result was excellent. <b>Conclusion</b> The personal dose monitoring system in our laboratory runs smoothly, and the monitoring results are accurate and reliable. The laboratory can issue test reports that meet the requirements of national standards.
ABSTRACT
With the extensive use of neutron sources in industry, medicine, and scientific research, the number of people exposed to neutron has been increasing, which highlights the importance of personal neutron dose monitoring in the field of radiation protection. In the past decades, researchers have developed and improved a variety of techniques and methods for personal neutron dose monitoring. This paper focuses on the problems and research progress of track dosimeters (solid-state nuclear track dosimeters and fluorescent nuclear track dosimeters), luminescent dosimeters (thermoluminescent dosimeters and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters), and bubble dosimeters in personal neutron dose monitoring.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the personal dose level of occupational external exposure among interventional radiology workers in Liaoning Province of China, and to provide a reference for better occupational radiation protection. Methods According to the national standard GBZ 128—2016 Specifications for individual monitoring of occupational external exposure, the thermoluminescence method was used to measure the monitoring dose inside the lead clothes (HW) and outside the lead clothes (HN) of interventional radiology workers, and the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for statistical analysis. Results Dual dosimeter monitoring data were collected from 307 interventional radiology workers in Liaoning Province in 2019, with a mean annual effective dose of 0.81 mSv and a maximum annual effective dose of 7.03 mSv, and 72.96% of the workers monitored had an annual effective dose of less than 1 mSv. The interventional radiology workers in tertiary hospitals had a significantly higher mean annual effective dose than those in secondary hospitals (0.95 mSv vs 0.65 mSv, P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in mean annual effective dose between departments (P < 0.05), and the department of interventional radiology had a significantly higher mean annual effective dose than the other departments (0.92 mSv vs 0.64 mSv), while the department of cardiology had a similar mean annual effective dose to the cerebrovascular department (0.78 mSv vs 0.78 mSv). Conclusion The occupational exposure dose of 307 interventional radiology workers in Liaoning Province meets the requirements in national regulations and standards and is higher than the national level, which suggests that radiation protection supervision and personal training should be further strengthened for interventional radiology.
ABSTRACT
@#<b>Objective</b> To analyze the monitoring results of external exposure dose of interventional radiology staff in a tertiary general hospital in Beijing, China, 2018—2020, and to provide a basis for safe guarding staff health and hospital radiation protection management. <b>Methods</b> A total of 321 interventional radiology staff in a hospital in Beijing were selected to collect information on the types of interventional work, positions, and personal dose monitoring results in 2018—2020. The dose monitoring results were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. <b>Results</b> The effective monitoring rate for the three years was 78.82%, 81.65%, and 96.85%, respectively, showing an increasing trend (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup><sub> trend</sub> = 16.134, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The annual dose equivalent per capita was 0.142, 0.142, and 0.265 mSv, respectively. The annual dose equivalent per capita in 2020 was significantly higher than those in 2018 (<i>H</i> = 24.562, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 2019 (<i>H</i> = 39.378, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The annual dose equivalent per capita in 2020 was in the order of interventional clinician > interventional nurse > technician (<i>H</i> = 10.699, 6.562, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The annual dose equivalent per capitain 2020 was higher in the cardiology interventional department than in the comprehensive interventional, neuro interventional, and vascular surgery departments (<i>H</i> = 35.530, 37.614, 35.496, <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b> The number of interventional radiology staff monitored from 2018 to 2020 increased year by year, so did the effective monitoring rate.The external exposure dose was at low levels, which generally meets the requirements of national occupational exposure limits. Training on radiation protection for interventional radiology staff should be further strengthened to raise awareness of radiation protection.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the reasons why the routine monitoring of personal dose of occupational external exposure of some radiological workers in our province reached the investigation level in 2018, so as to provide technical support for the correct decision making of administrative departments. Methods The registration forms for monitoring and verifying the personal dose of occupational external exposure were issued to radiation workers whose periodic dose reached or exceeded 1.25 mSv/ cycle. Results A total of 102 person-times were sent out in 53 verification forms, and 95 person-times were collected in 47 copies. The recovery rate was 88.68%, and 7 person-times did not feedback the verification forms. There were 15 cases of actual exposure, accounting for 15.79%, including 5 cases of radiological diagnostic staff, who did not close the protective door when operating exposure. Among them, the other 80 cases, accouting for 84.21% didn't receive actual exposure. Conclusion The vast majority of radiological workers who reached the survey level didn't receive actual exposure. 5 person-time radiological diagnostic staff, during the work did not close the protective door, subjected to abnormal radiation. Interventional medicine, nuclear medicine and industrial mobile flaw detection workers are at higher risk of abnormal exposures during their work. The suspicious results of the questionnaires without feedback were all less than the annual dose limit and the requirements of audit management. We will strengthen supervision of radiation health protection, raise the awareness of radiation protection among radiation workers, and improve radiation protection management and protection conditions for radiation workers in interventional medicine, nuclear medicine and industrial mobile flaw detection furtherly.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the status of radiological protection in Baoji City. Methods Using the questionnaire survey method, the survey forms were sent to the radiology clinics and other relevant units in the counties and districts of the city to investigate the basic situation of radiology and treatment of medical and health institutions, basic information of radiology and treatment equipment, personal information of radiation workers, and health monitoring of radiation workers. Results There is 1.13 X-ray diagnostic equipment per 10, 000 people, 0.015 radiotherapy equipment per 10, 000 people in Baoji City, and One million people own 11.4 CTs. There are 1, 102 radiation workers in Baoji City, and 2.92 per 10, 000 people. The occupational health check rate of medical radiation personnel was 87.7% within 2 years, the personal dose monitoring rate was 90.4%, the radiation worker training rate was 73.6% within 2 years, about the holding rate of "Radiation Staff Certificate" in Baoji City was 73.0%, and the occupational health file rate was 89.2%. The evaluation indexes of various health monitoring were lower, especially in township hospitals (35.7%～50.8%). Conclusion On the whole, the number of radiological diagnosis and treatment equipment is small, and Class A large equipment is almost blank. The city is stronger than the county in health monitoring. The status of health monitoring is very different from urban to rural areas.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of occupational health monitoring on radiation workers in national medical institutions in 2018. METHODS: Through the National Radiation Health Information Platform Subsystem Occupational Radiation Diseases and Occupational Health Monitoring System, the monitoring data including the overview of radiological diagnosis and treatment institutions, occupational health management, and occupational health examination information across the country were collected for analysis in 2018. RESULTS: In 2018, there were a total of 55 902 radiological diagnosis and treatment institutions with 353 141 radiation workers nationwide. The radiation dose monitoring rate on individuals and hospitals was 94.6%(334 222/353 141) and 97.3%(91 051/93 559), respectively. The rate of health examination was 84.6%(298 914/353 141) and 95.4%(87 031/91 244) respectively.The monitoring rate on chromosomal aberration in peripheral blood lymphocytes was 0.3% in radiation workers. The rate of opacity under the posterior lens capsule was 4.3% and the rate of thyroid nodules was 25.7% in interventional radiology and nuclear medicine workers. CONCLUSION:s The personal dose monitoring rate and occupational health examination rate of radiation workers in medical institutions in China are maintained at a relatively high level. However, monitoring attention should also be paid to the analysis of chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes, the examination of eye lens and thyroid gland.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the applicable conditions for using urine plutonium monitoring data to assess personal internal doses,in order to provide references for the occupational health management and the urine plutonium monitoring in nuclear sector.Methods Using some plutonium mixtures from DOE nuclear facilities,as an example,the urine plutonium levels were estimated through simulation calculation at 1 mSv effective dose arising from either acute or chronic inhalation of plutonium compounds,respectively.The results were compared with the typical detection limit of radiochemical separation and α-spectrometry.The feasibility of urine plutonium monitoring for dose assessment of internal radiation exposure was discussed.Results Only for type M plutonium compunds,1 mSv detection limit can be achieved using radiochemical separation and α-spectrometry within 10 d after inhalation.Conclusions Before the monitoring plan of urine plutonium is made,detection limits of monitoring method should be considered.Internal dose could be accessed using workplace air monitoring and working hours when necessary.